WEBVTT
Kind: captions
Language: en

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:04.865
Today I’d like to show you what might be my very&nbsp;favorite camera.

00:00:04.865 --> 00:00:08.536
This is an Olympus Pen EES-2.

00:00:08.536 --> 00:00:14.463
It’s a 35mm point-and-shoot camera from the late&nbsp;
1960’s and there are two remarkable things about it.

00:00:14.463 --> 00:00:17.564
The first is that this is a half-frame&nbsp;camera.

00:00:17.564 --> 00:00:24.488
Rather than expose the typical 36 by 24mm section of film
(the standard 35mm still&nbsp;image)

00:00:24.488 --> 00:00:29.283
it splits that in half and shoots an 18 by 24mm frame.

00:00:29.283 --> 00:00:33.098
The upshot of doing this is a&nbsp;slightly smaller camera (?)

00:00:33.098 --> 00:00:38.840
and supposedly the Pen name comes from the camera’s diminutive size.
[said ever-so-skeptically]

00:00:38.840 --> 00:00:42.807
I&nbsp;mean it’s not that small in the grand scheme but I... 
I guess I’ll roll with it.

00:00:42.807 --> 00:00:45.038
Oh, citation needed. Interesting.

00:00:45.038 --> 00:00:51.657
Anyway, my favorite consequence of halving the frame is that you get
double the&nbsp;exposures on every roll of film.

00:00:51.657 --> 00:00:53.076
That’s pretty neat!

00:00:53.076 --> 00:00:58.121
You’ll see that the exposure counter goes&nbsp;
to 72 rather than the typical 36.

00:00:58.121 --> 00:01:02.820
However many exposures are on the roll you’re putting in&nbsp;
the camera, this camera will let you take double that!

00:01:03.540 --> 00:01:08.940
Half-frame cameras were something of a&nbsp;fad in the 1960’s,
 but the fad would quickly die out.&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:01:09.480 --> 00:01:11.886
Frankly, I’m not sure why.

00:01:11.886 --> 00:01:16.104
You’d think people&nbsp;would appreciate getting
double the exposures with every roll of film,

00:01:16.104 --> 00:01:19.159
even if it meant a slight&nbsp;reduction in quality.

00:01:19.159 --> 00:01:25.238
I mean, for basic family photos and snapshots a half-frame still holds&nbsp;plenty of detail.

00:01:25.238 --> 00:01:32.546
These are some of my favorite shots I've taken with this camera;
I’ve enlarged them&nbsp;to 8X10 size and they’re still sharp-as-a-tack.

00:01:32.760 --> 00:01:37.347
Actually, as a matter of fact, the sideways&nbsp;film frames this shoots

00:01:37.347 --> 00:01:40.960
are the same size as a 35mm motion picture frame.

00:01:40.960 --> 00:01:45.242
And back&nbsp;in the day we were regularly blowing those up to movie screen sizes.

00:01:45.242 --> 00:01:48.480
Because, ya&nbsp;know, movies were shot on this film stuff.

00:01:49.020 --> 00:01:52.799
If I were to guess what caused the demise of&nbsp;the half-frame concept,

00:01:52.799 --> 00:01:59.280
it would be that unlike virtually all cameras which orient the frame&nbsp;
so that it matches the camera’s orientation,

00:01:59.795 --> 00:02:02.317
this one is backwards!

00:02:02.317 --> 00:02:05.700
Holding it up in the&nbsp;natural camera-holding position produces...

00:02:06.420 --> 00:02:08.522
a portrait frame,

00:02:08.522 --> 00:02:12.420
and if you want landscape&nbsp;frames you need to turn the camera sideways.

00:02:13.440 --> 00:02:18.146
That’s a bit awkward, and since people&nbsp;
tend to want a wider-than-tall image,

00:02:18.146 --> 00:02:21.581
this may have been seen as quite a downside&nbsp;back in its day.

00:02:21.581 --> 00:02:26.992
There were some half-frame cameras that got around this by running the&nbsp;film vertically through the body,

00:02:26.992 --> 00:02:33.101
but as a result they had wildly different form factors&nbsp;
from what people were used to in a camera.&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:02:33.101 --> 00:02:35.401
There’s really no way to get around this&nbsp;basic shape,

00:02:35.401 --> 00:02:41.632
so while you might be able to move controls around and make this its more&nbsp;natural orientation...

00:02:42.379 --> 00:02:44.067
that would still be weird.

00:02:44.067 --> 00:02:48.397
For what it’s worth, I find this pretty interesting from&nbsp;a creativity perspective.

00:02:48.397 --> 00:02:52.557
It’s easy to overlook turning a camera sideways for a portrait shot,

00:02:52.557 --> 00:02:57.653
but that’s this camera’s natural orientation so you almost have to consider it.

00:02:57.653 --> 00:03:01.747
As it happens,&nbsp;Kodak recently released a point-and-shoot half frame camera

00:03:01.747 --> 00:03:05.400
so I suppose the idea might be&nbsp;coming back in vogue with the resurgence of film.

00:03:06.360 --> 00:03:08.693
Especially since it’s getting kinda pricey.

00:03:08.693 --> 00:03:15.195
One&nbsp;thing people like to do with this format is plan images in pairs
and print them together like this,

00:03:15.195 --> 00:03:21.554
though frankly I’ve never really considered that
and just treat them as individual images when&nbsp;I’m shooting.

00:03:21.554 --> 00:03:28.864
I think that got started because most film processing labs and scanners
really&nbsp;don’t know what to do with half-frames —

00:03:28.864 --> 00:03:34.476
despite the fact that the film edge markings clearly&nbsp;
accommodate them and have since forever ago!

00:03:34.476 --> 00:03:39.321
so the roll gets scanned or even printed as 36 pairs&nbsp;of images.

00:03:39.321 --> 00:03:40.401
But c’mon, folks.

00:03:40.401 --> 00:03:42.045
You can crop them.

00:03:42.259 --> 00:03:44.662
Anyway I’m still talking about the half-frame&nbsp;part,

00:03:44.662 --> 00:03:51.164
and that’s not nearly as interesting as the fact that this camera 
has fully automatic&nbsp;exposure control,

00:03:51.164 --> 00:03:53.775
yet it doesn’t need any batteries.

00:03:53.775 --> 00:03:59.049
In fact there’s nowhere to put them because this is a light-powered camera.

00:04:00.600 --> 00:04:06.542
OK, powered might be a stretch - 
you still wind the&nbsp;film manually with this thumb-wheel,

00:04:06.542 --> 00:04:10.012
uh, this crank is for rewinding at the end of a roll...

00:04:10.012 --> 00:04:13.229
basically the&nbsp;film-handling bits are all human-powered.

00:04:13.229 --> 00:04:16.732
But the shutter speed and aperture are set automatically.

00:04:16.732 --> 00:04:22.768
It will even prevent you from taking a picture if there’s not enough light - a little red flag&nbsp;pops up in the viewfinder,

00:04:22.768 --> 00:04:26.495
and a mechanical interlock prevents the shutter from releasing.

00:04:26.495 --> 00:04:31.960
This is a&nbsp;true point-and-shoot camera, completely automatic
(aside from focusing)

00:04:31.960 --> 00:04:35.718
despite not needing&nbsp;a power source
and being entirely analog.

00:04:36.259 --> 00:04:37.245
[shutter clicks]

00:04:37.245 --> 00:04:40.045
You might be wondering how this works.

00:04:40.045 --> 00:04:43.268
Good thing&nbsp;you clicked on this particular video ‘cause I’m gonna tell ya!

00:04:43.268 --> 00:04:48.020
But first, a one-paragraph explanation on&nbsp;camera basics.

00:04:48.020 --> 00:04:51.252
Photographic film has a certain sensitivity to light,

00:04:51.252 --> 00:04:57.587
and to form images correctly&nbsp;on the film, you need to control how much light hits it during exposure -

00:04:57.587 --> 00:05:01.160
too much, and the&nbsp;image will appear bright with little detail,

00:05:01.160 --> 00:05:04.241
not enough and an image may not form at all.

00:05:04.241 --> 00:05:07.613
A&nbsp;camera has two means of controlling the exposure:

00:05:07.613 --> 00:05:12.357
a variable lens aperture which changes how much&nbsp;
light is allowed through the lens,

00:05:12.357 --> 00:05:18.060
and how long it keeps the shutter open and exposing the&nbsp;
film to that light, known as the shutter speed.

00:05:18.840 --> 00:05:22.709
Adjustments to these values are made in what&nbsp;are called stops,

00:05:22.709 --> 00:05:27.781
with each stop doubling or halving the amount of light allowed onto the&nbsp;film.

00:05:27.781 --> 00:05:34.914
For example, a 1/50 of a second shutter speed 
allows one stop more — twice as much&nbsp;— light

00:05:34.914 --> 00:05:37.320
compared to a 1/100 second shutter speed.

00:05:38.160 --> 00:05:43.372
That can be compensated for by closing&nbsp;
the lens aperture down by one stop,&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:05:43.372 --> 00:05:46.138
which allows half as much light through it.

00:05:46.138 --> 00:05:51.253
Professional photographers might want to do that
to increase the depth of focusing field,

00:05:51.253 --> 00:05:57.755
or&nbsp;they might want to open the lens wider
and use a faster shutter speed to reduce motion blur.

00:05:57.755 --> 00:06:01.380
This camera, though, well it handles all that for you.

00:06:01.380 --> 00:06:05.758
Most of this camera’s exposure control is&nbsp;done with the aperture.

00:06:05.758 --> 00:06:09.594
In its resting state, the aperture is closed all the way.

00:06:09.594 --> 00:06:13.805
What you’re&nbsp;seeing in the center of the lens is the opening
 made by the aperture blades.

00:06:13.805 --> 00:06:19.915
This camera has&nbsp;a square aperture
which is a little weird but it works just fine.

00:06:19.915 --> 00:06:25.989
The itty-bitty almost-pinhole&nbsp;
is the lens in its most stopped-down state, ƒ/22.

00:06:26.640 --> 00:06:33.107
The aperture is mechanically linked to the&nbsp;shutter button,
and as you press it in, the aperture opens up.

00:06:33.107 --> 00:06:37.337
When it’s all the way&nbsp;open,
the camera lets as much light through as it can.

00:06:37.337 --> 00:06:40.773
In this case the widest ƒ-stop is 2.8.

00:06:40.773 --> 00:06:43.460
Just to be clear, this is not the shutter.

00:06:43.460 --> 00:06:46.572
That’s behind the lens and we can’t see it here.

00:06:46.572 --> 00:06:53.880
The&nbsp;shutter remains closed, preventing light from hitting the film, 
except for that fraction&nbsp;of a second when you actually snap a photo.

00:06:54.600 --> 00:06:58.323
You can manually select different aperture&nbsp;values with this ring.

00:06:58.323 --> 00:07:01.580
You’ll notice that when I pick a value somewhere in the middle,

00:07:01.580 --> 00:07:08.006
the blades&nbsp;start to open with the shutter button as before,
but now they stop opening mid-way.

00:07:08.006 --> 00:07:12.144
This here&nbsp;is ƒ/5.6, a fairly typical setting.

00:07:12.144 --> 00:07:15.999
But, watch what happens when I switch this to auto mode.

00:07:15.999 --> 00:07:19.547
The&nbsp;aperture is back to opening all the way with the shutter button.

00:07:19.547 --> 00:07:27.087
But if I shine a little light into&nbsp;the camera's lens and press the button,
well now the aperture doesn’t open all the way.

00:07:27.087 --> 00:07:31.970
If I make the&nbsp;light very intense, the aperture hardly moves at all.

00:07:31.970 --> 00:07:35.957
Somehow, this is reacting to more light hitting&nbsp;the lens

00:07:35.957 --> 00:07:42.000
and reducing how much the aperture opens to compensate and produce equivalent&nbsp;exposures on film.

00:07:43.158 --> 00:07:44.606
That’s pretty wild.

00:07:45.060 --> 00:07:49.132
To understand how this works, first I want to&nbsp;show you something else.

00:07:49.132 --> 00:07:54.505
When using a fully-manual camera,
to know what aperture and shutter speed&nbsp;settings you should use

00:07:54.505 --> 00:07:57.660
a light meter is awfully handy.

00:07:57.660 --> 00:08:00.878
This here is a simple handheld light&nbsp;meter

00:08:00.878 --> 00:08:03.302
which consists of a light sensor here,

00:08:03.302 --> 00:08:05.743
a dial with a buncha numbers there,

00:08:05.743 --> 00:08:08.155
and a&nbsp;simple display down below.

00:08:08.155 --> 00:08:12.747
The needle in that display moves depending on how much light hits the&nbsp;sensor,

00:08:12.747 --> 00:08:17.168
and by turning the dial so that the little
red-circle-on-a-stick thing surrounds the needle,

00:08:17.168 --> 00:08:21.225
you end up with a chart of acceptable shutter speed and aperture settings.

00:08:21.225 --> 00:08:26.431
Changing the film&nbsp;speed setting simply moves the aperture values independent of the rest of the mechanism

00:08:26.431 --> 00:08:29.040
which&nbsp;effectively factors in the film’s sensitivity.

00:08:30.000 --> 00:08:35.821
The reason I wanted to show you this particular&nbsp;light meter
is that this also doesn’t use&nbsp;batteries.

00:08:35.821 --> 00:08:40.576
The sensor here is a selenium light&nbsp;cell, an early photovoltaic cell.

00:08:40.576 --> 00:08:43.386
Think of it like a really old solar panel.

00:08:43.386 --> 00:08:48.327
When light hits&nbsp;it, it generates a voltage and that’s what’s moving the needle.

00:08:48.327 --> 00:08:52.961
Basically all this is is an&nbsp;old-fangled solar cell hooked up to a voltmeter

00:08:52.961 --> 00:08:58.440
that’s been repurposed alongside a clever&nbsp;
slide-rule-like chart handy to photographers.

00:08:59.160 --> 00:09:05.358
The characteristics of the cell’s output are very&nbsp;
useful in photography because it’s logarithmic;&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:09:05.358 --> 00:09:10.090
each doubling of light that hits the cell moves the&nbsp;needle the same amount.

00:09:10.090 --> 00:09:14.692
So if there’s twice as much light it will move the needle one ƒ-stop&nbsp;over,

00:09:14.692 --> 00:09:20.692
which of course realigns the chart by one stop 
once you move the circle-on-a-stick thing.

00:09:20.692 --> 00:09:24.053
A quadrupling of light would move the needle two stops over,

00:09:24.053 --> 00:09:27.754
an eight-fold increase would result&nbsp;
in three stops of movement,

00:09:27.754 --> 00:09:29.548
and you get the idea.

00:09:29.548 --> 00:09:35.986
The honeycomb lensing in front of the cell&nbsp;
makes it most sensitive to a camera’s general field of view.

00:09:35.986 --> 00:09:38.992
I don’t know what exactly&nbsp;the frame is this guy’s looking for,

00:09:38.992 --> 00:09:43.691
but the idea is that you can just point&nbsp;this in the general direction
of where you want to take a picture

00:09:43.691 --> 00:09:46.140
and it’ll&nbsp;give you decent exposure settings.

00:09:46.560 --> 00:09:53.198
It’ll be a scene average so more particular&nbsp;photographers would want to take that into&nbsp;account for high-contrast scenes,

00:09:53.198 --> 00:10:00.637
and might&nbsp;even want to bring this guy up to something in the scene that will register as a middle-gray&nbsp;and take a more selective reading.

00:10:00.637 --> 00:10:06.900
Oh and you definitely want to shade the sensor from direct&nbsp;
sunlight as that will absolutely skew the reading.

00:10:06.900 --> 00:10:15.005
Now, you might have already noticed that the lens of&nbsp;
the Olympus Pen is surrounded by a similar-looking&nbsp;honeycomb stuff.

00:10:15.005 --> 00:10:16.966
Intriguing, right?

00:10:16.966 --> 00:10:25.024
Now might be&nbsp;a good time to mention that the EE in EES-2
stands for Electronic Eye.

00:10:25.024 --> 00:10:30.302
Let’s go ahead and assume&nbsp;that the honeycomb stuff is some sorta light meter

00:10:30.302 --> 00:10:31.406
(because it is).

00:10:31.406 --> 00:10:39.398
How could we design a camera&nbsp;which uses the mechanism of a conventional light meter to automatically set an exposure setting?

00:10:39.398 --> 00:10:41.854
Well, remember how the aperture functions?

00:10:41.854 --> 00:10:46.519
It starts out all the way closed, and it’s opened by&nbsp;
the shutter button.

00:10:46.519 --> 00:10:52.419
But when enough light lands on the lens, something stops it from opening all the&nbsp;way.

00:10:52.419 --> 00:10:55.233
What could that something be?

00:10:55.233 --> 00:10:56.428
Well,

00:10:56.428 --> 00:11:02.366
through the Magic of Buying Two of Them,
I have an already&nbsp;taken apart one right here which I can show you!

00:11:02.760 --> 00:11:09.619
Here is the light meter and viewfinder assembly&nbsp;
from an earlier variant of this camera, the Pen&nbsp;EE-S.

00:11:09.619 --> 00:11:11.952
We have the selenium light cell here,

00:11:11.952 --> 00:11:17.281
and&nbsp;a couple of itsy bitsy wires connect it through a resistor to this…

00:11:17.281 --> 00:11:18.515
thing.

00:11:18.515 --> 00:11:21.326
Notice there’s a&nbsp;needle sticking out of it?

00:11:21.326 --> 00:11:26.010
Well, watch what happens when I shine more light onto the cell.

00:11:26.010 --> 00:11:28.179
That needle moved!

00:11:28.179 --> 00:11:36.283
This is the same exact concept as the hand-held light meter, 
but rearranged,&nbsp;miniaturized, and stuck into a camera body.

00:11:36.780 --> 00:11:41.091
But hang on, how does that translate into an&nbsp;exposure setting?

00:11:41.400 --> 00:11:43.387
Surely there must be more to it.

00:11:43.387 --> 00:11:44.302
Well,

00:11:44.302 --> 00:11:50.263
through the Magic of Buying Three of&nbsp;Them,
I have a not-yet-taken-apart-one right here!

00:11:51.101 --> 00:11:55.494
This is another EES-2, but in grey, and I need&nbsp;to disassemble it

00:11:55.494 --> 00:11:58.928
because the shutter blades are sticking and need to be cleaned.

00:11:58.928 --> 00:12:06.751
This process is fiddly&nbsp;and finicky, involving tiny little screws
and also removing the lens’s front element.

00:12:06.751 --> 00:12:15.333
Which is a pretty&nbsp;precarious proposition as focusing is accomplished by rotating that element and thus slightly unscrewing it from&nbsp;the body,

00:12:15.333 --> 00:12:22.069
so before you take it apart you absolutely need to set focus to infinity and mark the lens position&nbsp;somehow

00:12:22.069 --> 00:12:25.115
so you can put it back exactly where it was.

00:12:25.115 --> 00:12:29.113
If you mess that up, all your pictures&nbsp;will be blurry as heck.

00:12:29.370 --> 00:12:30.934
Ask me how I know!

00:12:31.320 --> 00:12:36.067
Anyway, once we’re to this point&nbsp; we can see the needle — barely.&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:12:36.067 --> 00:12:37.851
It’s tucked right up here.

00:12:37.851 --> 00:12:41.917
Right now&nbsp;it’s free-floating, and you can see it react to incoming light.

00:12:41.917 --> 00:12:44.880
It really is just&nbsp;like the light meter we were looking at.

00:12:45.600 --> 00:12:49.509
But when I depress the shutter button, well the magic&nbsp;happens.

00:12:49.509 --> 00:12:55.493
An intricate series of linkages cause a pair of feelers
to move upward towards that&nbsp;needle.

00:12:55.493 --> 00:13:00.978
The first feeler touches the needle
and jams it against a stop right above it to keep it&nbsp;from moving.

00:13:00.978 --> 00:13:06.131
Then a second feeler with sloping, stepped teeth approaches the needle.

00:13:06.131 --> 00:13:10.658
That second&nbsp;feeler is connected to the aperture mechanism of the camera,

00:13:10.658 --> 00:13:16.414
and where it stops along its journey&nbsp;upward
determines how far the aperture will open.

00:13:16.860 --> 00:13:19.682
And the needle is what stops&nbsp;it.

00:13:19.682 --> 00:13:21.153
See where this is going?

00:13:21.153 --> 00:13:28.163
When there’s less light hitting the camera,&nbsp;
the needle is farther to the right, which is among the skinnier parts of the feeler.

00:13:28.163 --> 00:13:34.475
That&nbsp;allows it to travel farther upward - notice how the thicker parts of the feeler are now above the&nbsp;needle.

00:13:34.475 --> 00:13:39.513
With the feeler in this high position,
it opens the aperture blades a great amount.

00:13:39.513 --> 00:13:43.803
But as&nbsp;more light hits the camera, the needle is pushed farther to the left,

00:13:43.803 --> 00:13:49.325
so the feeler’s thicker parts&nbsp;will hit it first and thus it can’t travel as far upward.

00:13:49.325 --> 00:13:56.197
That prevents the aperture from opening as&nbsp;much, reducing the amount of light that can travel through the lens to compensate.

00:13:56.197 --> 00:14:00.729
Each doubling&nbsp;of light hitting the lens pushes the needle one stop over,

00:14:00.729 --> 00:14:04.818
which in turn restricts the opening&nbsp;
of the aperture by one stop,

00:14:04.818 --> 00:14:11.350
thus the amount of light that makes it through the lens remains&nbsp;
consistent no matter how bright the scene is.

00:14:11.700 --> 00:14:13.606
Pretty clever, huh?

00:14:13.606 --> 00:14:20.879
A simple integration of a&nbsp;selenium light cell and analog meter mechanism into a camera body’s aperture mechanism

00:14:20.879 --> 00:14:23.486
allows for automatic exposure control.

00:14:24.180 --> 00:14:28.680
But you might have noticed that the&nbsp;
aperture feeler has two sections to it.&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:14:28.680 --> 00:14:30.755
What’s going on with that?

00:14:30.755 --> 00:14:34.800
Ah, well, this&nbsp;camera actually has two shutter speeds.

00:14:34.800 --> 00:14:39.338
It will either shoot at 1/200 of a second or 1/40&nbsp;of a second,

00:14:39.338 --> 00:14:44.433
and that first feeler which traps the needle is what determines which one it will&nbsp;use.

00:14:44.433 --> 00:14:49.594
Oh, by the way, this arrangement is often called trap-needle metering.

00:14:49.594 --> 00:14:51.824
Probably&nbsp;should have brought that up earlier.

00:14:51.824 --> 00:14:56.841
Anyway, you might have caught that the first&nbsp;
feeler itself had two steps to it.

00:14:56.841 --> 00:15:01.011
If the needle is far enough to the right that the higher part&nbsp;
of the feeler hits it,

00:15:01.011 --> 00:15:06.538
the shutter will engage with a delay mechanism which holds it open&nbsp;for just an itty bit.

00:15:06.538 --> 00:15:08.400
That’s the 1/40 of a second speed.

00:15:09.000 --> 00:15:13.896
Here’s how that works:
winding the film puts the&nbsp;shutter mechanism under tension.

00:15:13.896 --> 00:15:18.246
When it releases, this small cam will quickly make a complete rotation,

00:15:18.246 --> 00:15:22.536
which rapidly opens and closes the shutter blades through this linkage.

00:15:22.536 --> 00:15:28.208
On that&nbsp;cam is a protrusion which will hit this piece of metal and stop its motion.

00:15:28.208 --> 00:15:34.451
That piece of metal&nbsp;is attached to this spring-loaded brass weight,
which right now I’m preventing from moving.

00:15:34.451 --> 00:15:40.937
When I let&nbsp;go of it, the force of the shutter’s spring will push the weight out of its way, and the&nbsp;shutter closes.

00:15:40.937 --> 00:15:47.909
The function of the lever and weight is to deliberately
(and literally) get&nbsp;in the way of the shutter mechanism’s movement,

00:15:47.909 --> 00:15:52.982
with the mass of that weight providing&nbsp;
a calibrated delay that slows it down.

00:15:52.982 --> 00:15:58.505
But if the needle is beyond that first step, the&nbsp;
feeler will travel a bit farther upward -

00:15:58.505 --> 00:16:03.540
just enough so that this lever will travel&nbsp;
beyond this linkage and allow it to move.

00:16:03.960 --> 00:16:06.273
Now, as the shutter button is depressed,

00:16:06.273 --> 00:16:10.361
the weight and its stop are pushed out of the way by the linkage.

00:16:10.361 --> 00:16:15.846
With the delay no&nbsp;longer in the picture,
the shutter mechanism fires in one swift motion.

00:16:15.846 --> 00:16:17.266
Let’s look at&nbsp;that again.

00:16:17.266 --> 00:16:25.209
With moderate light levels, the needle stops the feeler here so this lever&nbsp;prevents this linkage from moving with the shutter button.

00:16:25.560 --> 00:16:31.020
When the shutter fires, the shutter cam will slam&nbsp;into the weight,
briefly holding it open.

00:16:31.620 --> 00:16:35.529
But if there’s enough light, the needle&nbsp;stops the feeler here.

00:16:35.529 --> 00:16:38.747
And now that lever out of the way of the linkage,

00:16:38.747 --> 00:16:45.395
so it will actually push the&nbsp;weight out of the way as you press the shutter button 
and therefore bypass the delay.

00:16:45.900 --> 00:16:51.960
Take a listen to what those shutter releases&nbsp;sound like - the difference is a bit&nbsp;subtle, but see if you can hear it.&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:16:59.460 --> 00:17:04.687
At the slow speed, you can hear the shutter&nbsp;
open and close as two discrete clicks.

00:17:04.687 --> 00:17:07.077
[two discrete clicks]

00:17:07.077 --> 00:17:13.350
But at the fast speed, you only hear one click as the&nbsp;
shutter is opened and shut in one smooth motion.

00:17:13.350 --> 00:17:14.495
[one click]

00:17:14.495 --> 00:17:20.540
The transition between steps in the shutter&nbsp;
feeler lines up perfectly with the aperture feeler’s little kink.

00:17:20.540 --> 00:17:23.820
And this is designed&nbsp;to prioritize the higher shutter speed.

00:17:24.420 --> 00:17:30.128
The farthest right position represents a&nbsp;1/40 of a second exposure at ƒ/2.8.

00:17:30.128 --> 00:17:33.737
That’s the widest-open lens at the slowest shutter&nbsp;speed.

00:17:33.737 --> 00:17:41.820
But as soon as there’s enough light to make a 1/200 exposure work,
the aperture&nbsp;scale resets and we start again at ƒ/2.8.&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:17:42.840 --> 00:17:46.154
This won’t mean much to you if you’re not&nbsp;familiar with cameras,

00:17:46.154 --> 00:17:53.726
but for a consumer camera this design makes perfect sense as a 1/40&nbsp;second exposure requires a fairly steady hand,&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:17:53.726 --> 00:17:56.657
but 1/200 is much more forgiving.

00:17:56.657 --> 00:17:59.775
Best to use&nbsp;the faster shutter speed whenever possible.

00:17:59.775 --> 00:18:03.375
Ah, but what about that red-flag shutter&nbsp;interlock doohickey?

00:18:03.375 --> 00:18:04.989
How’s that work?

00:18:04.989 --> 00:18:07.845
Well, if there’s not enough light to take a photo,

00:18:07.845 --> 00:18:11.193
the&nbsp;needle won’t even reach the position of the feelers.

00:18:11.193 --> 00:18:15.516
That means they’ll go right past the needle when they start&nbsp;moving upward,

00:18:15.516 --> 00:18:21.028
and that jambs the shutter mechanism
while lifting the little red flag up into the viewfinder.

00:18:21.028 --> 00:18:26.723
One of the things I really like about this camera's design
is that its lens cap covers the light sensor

00:18:26.723 --> 00:18:30.849
so if&nbsp;you left that on it won’t let you waste the frame.

00:18:30.849 --> 00:18:31.994
Very nice.

00:18:31.994 --> 00:18:38.641
Oh, and to explain the manual aperture&nbsp;settings,
they’re marked “for flash” as that’s their main purpose.

00:18:38.641 --> 00:18:44.637
On manual settings the sensor&nbsp;is ignored
and the shutter will always fire at 1/40 of a second.

00:18:44.637 --> 00:18:51.115
Using a chart on your flash&nbsp;unit and estimating the distance to your subject,
you’ll set the aperture accordingly.

00:18:51.115 --> 00:18:55.964
The hot&nbsp;shoe on top was one of the things added for the EES-2.

00:18:55.964 --> 00:19:00.558
Now, you might wonder how the camera compensates&nbsp;
for different film speeds.

00:19:00.558 --> 00:19:08.238
There is a film speed selector ring on the lens
and this model will&nbsp;meter for any speed between 25 and 400 ISO.

00:19:09.120 --> 00:19:10.981
How is it doing that?

00:19:10.981 --> 00:19:14.145
Well, watch as I change&nbsp;the film speeds.

00:19:14.145 --> 00:19:19.364
Notice how as I get closer to 25, the numbers are getting closer together.

00:19:19.740 --> 00:19:21.469
Understand why?

00:19:21.469 --> 00:19:23.789
To make this work with different&nbsp;film speeds,

00:19:23.789 --> 00:19:29.592
Olympus didn’t need to do anything fancy
like incorporate a variable resistor, instead...

00:19:29.592 --> 00:19:32.238
they just cover up parts of the sensor!

00:19:32.238 --> 00:19:37.515
It’s hard to see but the actual sensor only&nbsp;
occupies half of the circle around the lens,

00:19:37.515 --> 00:19:41.673
and turning the speed selector is sliding a&nbsp;cover over it.

00:19:41.673 --> 00:19:47.341
When shooting 400 speed film,
all of the sensor is exposed to light so it’s at&nbsp;its most sensitive.

00:19:47.341 --> 00:19:51.895
The needle will move as far as it ever will with a given amount of light.

00:19:51.895 --> 00:19:59.940
But when you use 200 speed film, which is half as sensitive to light,
you need twice as much&nbsp;light to hit the film to get a correct exposure.

00:20:00.960 --> 00:20:06.377
And as silly as it sounds,
just covering up half&nbsp;of the sensor surface will compensate.

00:20:06.377 --> 00:20:11.880
That will make it so that twice as much light is needed to&nbsp;
put the needle in the same position as before.

00:20:12.240 --> 00:20:13.398
See how that works?

00:20:13.398 --> 00:20:17.153
It’s basically just fooling&nbsp;the light meter into thinking there’s less light,

00:20:17.153 --> 00:20:22.663
so it responds by opening up the aperture by&nbsp;
one stop for every half of the sensor you block.

00:20:23.280 --> 00:20:30.420
Cover up half again and now only ¼ of the sensor is exposed,
so it is ¼ as sensitive as it was;

00:20:30.420 --> 00:20:33.269
perfect for 100 speed film.

00:20:33.269 --> 00:20:40.747
Leave only ⅛ of&nbsp;it exposed and you’ve dulled the sensitivity another stop,
making it work with 50 speed film.

00:20:40.747 --> 00:20:45.970
And at the slowest speed setting, 25, you need 16 times as much light

00:20:45.970 --> 00:20:51.300
so only a tiny sliver - 1/16&nbsp;of the sensor’s surface - is exposed to light.

00:20:52.020 --> 00:20:57.815
Perhaps the most remarkable thing about&nbsp;
this metering system is how well it works.&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:20:57.815 --> 00:21:01.178
Despite being a design originally from 1961,

00:21:01.178 --> 00:21:06.736
a design which is mostly mechanical
but with a selenium light meter cleverly hacked into&nbsp;it,

00:21:06.736 --> 00:21:08.820
this camera still functions perfectly.

00:21:10.080 --> 00:21:11.836
That is, once I gave it a little help.

00:21:11.836 --> 00:21:18.686
A common problem&nbsp;that pops up after 40 or 50 years is gunk on the aperture blades, which jams the mechanism.

00:21:18.686 --> 00:21:25.680
I needed to fix that on this camera when I got it; it’s very common but cleanup with&nbsp;isopropyl alcohol usually does the trick.&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:21:25.680 --> 00:21:30.600
Assuming it’s mechanically&nbsp;sound, though, this just… works.

00:21:31.260 --> 00:21:36.453
I’ve never taken a photo with this&nbsp;camera
that wasn’t exposed at least&nbsp;mostly correctly.

00:21:36.453 --> 00:21:39.780
Negatives have decent and&nbsp;uniform density,
color or black and white.

00:21:40.320 --> 00:21:45.566
About the only thing that occasionally happens&nbsp;
is a bit of washout in high-contrast scenes,&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:21:45.566 --> 00:21:49.621
but that’s to be expected with a meter which&nbsp;simply averages the frame.

00:21:49.621 --> 00:21:53.844
So long as you aren’t shooting the fastest speed one of these cameras&nbsp;supports,

00:21:53.844 --> 00:21:59.662
you could compensate by adjusting the ISO setting upward,
causing it to underexpose&nbsp;the image.

00:21:59.662 --> 00:22:04.905
But leaving it set to your film’s box speed will almost always produce decent results.

00:22:04.905 --> 00:22:12.097
The lensing in front of the sensor is apparently very good at rejecting light from areas not&nbsp;in the camera’s field of view.

00:22:12.097 --> 00:22:16.692
Even shooting partially into the sun results in apparently&nbsp;decent exposures.

00:22:16.692 --> 00:22:22.774
I mean I’m sure I’ve done it several times and yet *all* the images
I’ve taken&nbsp;with this are workable...

00:22:22.774 --> 00:22:24.000
exposure-wise at least.

00:22:24.540 --> 00:22:29.581
Now I should note that Olympus wasn’t the only&nbsp;
company making cameras that worked like this.&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:22:29.581 --> 00:22:34.680
The selenium light cell made its way into loads of&nbsp;cameras,
even movie cameras like this one.&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:22:35.460 --> 00:22:39.182
But I’m nonetheless enamored with this particular&nbsp;camera.

00:22:39.182 --> 00:22:44.097
Its design and simplicity are just right in that sweet spot.

00:22:44.097 --> 00:22:52.281
And apparently Olympus&nbsp;did such a great job with this design that they’d slap it onto full-frame cameras like the&nbsp;venerable Trip 35.

00:22:53.182 --> 00:23:01.877
Once you get these side-by-side it’s clear that the design of the Trip 35
was&nbsp;more than just “inspired” by the Pen EES-2.&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:23:02.820 --> 00:23:07.860
These are the same camera mechanisms just&nbsp;
with different bodies and lens focal lengths.&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:23:07.860 --> 00:23:10.662
I mean even the lens caps are interchangeable.

00:23:10.662 --> 00:23:18.281
Oh! And the Trip has the same red flag
which means it doesn’t fill the viewfinder because it’s too&nbsp;small!

00:23:18.281 --> 00:23:21.318
Oh right, and you’ll notice that the Trip...

00:23:22.200 --> 00:23:24.660
is barely any bigger than the Pen.

00:23:25.355 --> 00:23:27.780
I&nbsp;mean, I guess it’s enough to be significant

00:23:27.780 --> 00:23:33.849
but I’m really not sure that making a smaller&nbsp;camera
was the true goal of cutting the frame in half.

00:23:34.500 --> 00:23:38.123
Anyway, I hope you enjoyed this look into these&nbsp;cameras.

00:23:38.123 --> 00:23:44.464
There were quite a few Olympus Pen models back in the day, but it’s the EE series which&nbsp;intrigues me the most.

00:23:44.464 --> 00:23:51.000
Taking the concept of the humble light meter and using it in conjunction&nbsp;with simple levers, feelers, doodads, and whatsits&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:23:51.000 --> 00:23:57.825
to create a fully-automatic camera is the sort of&nbsp;
genius that we don’t often see today.

00:23:57.825 --> 00:24:02.876
Some really interesting innovation can happen
when you take&nbsp;two different technologies —

00:24:02.876 --> 00:24:04.801
and connect them.

00:24:04.801 --> 00:24:05.391
[oof]

00:24:05.650 --> 00:24:08.227
♫ olympically smooth jazz ♫

00:24:09.801 --> 00:24:12.710
Today, I’d like to.. Ouhh bleglebleblbblblblberblbulbb

00:24:13.431 --> 00:24:17.086
Vooooogue.
Sa, sa said that really weird.

00:24:17.884 --> 00:24:19.717
Kodak recently released a point-and-shoot...

00:24:19.717 --> 00:24:20.217
oh yeah

00:24:20.217 --> 00:24:20.985
I was ‘sposeda pick up the camar

00:24:20.985 --> 00:24:22.775
ba GAARRGHGHHGHGHGHG

00:24:22.775 --> 00:24:27.650
Though, frankly, I’ve never really considered that&nbsp;
and just treat them as individual shots when I’m…

00:24:29.246 --> 00:24:29.746
ppbbt!

00:24:30.644 --> 00:24:33.323
I’ve made an error in the script!

00:24:33.323 --> 00:24:38.374
Uh, so anyway the roll gets&nbsp;processed or even printed… eugh…

00:24:38.374 --> 00:24:39.208
[some sorta beastly snort-growl]

00:24:39.208 --> 00:24:41.917
A light meter is awfully handy.

00:24:41.917 --> 00:24:45.626
This&nbsp;here… I can’t grab things correctly.

00:24:46.260 --> 00:24:49.920
When it’s all the way open, the&nbsp;
camera left as much light through…&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:24:51.720 --> 00:24:53.791
Nope, that was just me not reading.

00:24:55.619 --> 00:24:58.333
So, apparently a lot of you giggle at "Pen EE-S"

00:24:58.333 --> 00:25:00.961
I gotta be honest, I'm not smelling what you're stepping in.

00:25:00.961 --> 00:25:03.463
That's similar to "pennies" - pen, E.

00:25:03.463 --> 00:25:04.182
Pen E.

00:25:04.182 --> 00:25:07.545
The other thing you might be thinking of starts with a syllable that rhymes with "keen."

00:25:07.545 --> 00:25:10.030
I mean, at least it does in my neck of the woods.

00:25:10.030 --> 00:25:10.842
Y'all are weird.

